Actionable Escalations
When the Scrum Guidance Body identifies organizational policies that limit teams from gaining the full value of Scrum, a formal escalation is raised to obtain approval to modify those policies.
Key Points
- Used when existing company policies block effective Scrum adoption or outcomes.
- Initiated by the Scrum Guidance Body (or equivalent governance) with clear evidence of impact.
- Follows a defined escalation path to decision makers who can approve policy changes.
- Results in a policy update, approved exception, or a documented resolution to remove the impediment.
Example
A company mandates comprehensive upfront requirements sign-off before any work can start. The Scrum Guidance Body determines this prevents iterative delivery and learning. They submit an escalation to the PMO and CIO requesting a policy change to allow a product vision, a rolling backlog, and staged approvals. Leadership approves a pilot exception and later updates the policy company-wide.
PMP Example Question
Which best describes Actionable Escalations in an agile governance context?
- Documenting impediments in the team backlog for the Scrum Master to handle later.
- Formally requesting leadership approval to change a policy that is hindering Scrum effectiveness.
- Scheduling additional Daily Scrums to increase team communication.
- Submitting a scope change to the change control board to add new features.
Correct Answer: B — Formally requesting leadership approval to change a blocking policy
Explanation: Actionable Escalations are raised to decision makers to modify policies that prevent teams from realizing the full benefits of Scrum.
